Contract Drafting Rules (Part 1)

In previous posts, have discussed various kind of Contracts based on the Nature of Transaction, Mode of Project Delivery and Compensation Methods.

The next step in the journey is to learn How to Draft a Good Contract, which is simple, error free and easy to execute. In this post we are going to discuss 6 important Contract Drafting Rules necessary to form a dispute-free contract

Contract drafting highly specialized skill

Contract drafting is highly specialized skill and requires lot of experience, maturity and wisdom. Moreover, the contract writer should have good understanding of industry practices and in-depth knowledge of contract & procurement laws.

In addition to the above, contract drafting requires a different attitude and mind-set. This is because any extreme (or casual) approach could make the agreement VOID or impossible to operate. Consequently, it may render the contract subject to litigation thereof. This situation may result into wastage of lot of time, money and efforts. Even if the things do not go to such extremes, poorly drafted contracts could lead to lot of confusion and misunderstanding. As a result, it could give room to unnecessary correspondence and contractual tussle between the parties thereby defeating the intended purpose.

Contract should be easy to understand and interpret

Our ultimate purpose should be to draft a contract which is easy to understanding and interpret. Accordingly, we need to draft contractual provisions in such manner so as to avoid confusion, discrepancy, more than one interpretation and misunderstanding between the parties.

We can achieve this objective by followings certain rules while drafting a contract. These rules are called Contract Drafting Rules and 6 of them are mentioned below;

  1. Use appropriate language
  2. Avoid Contradiction
  3. Avoid Duplication
  4. Use References & Cross-references
  5. Mutually explanatory & complementary clauses
  6. Maintain Uniformity and consistency.

In this post let us discuss first two (2) rules. Balance 4 rules shall be discussed in next post

6 Contract Drafting Rules:

1. Use appropriate language:

This is one of the most important Contract Drafting Rule because Contracts are written and interpreted in English or another language. For seamless execution of the contract, it is imperative that both parties draw the same meaning from the contract clauses. Moreover, parties should understand their rights and obligations in the same sense.

In view of the above, let us consider the followings aspects regarding language while drafting a contract

  • Use language which is easy to understanding and interpret.
  • Choose most appropriate words as used in day-to-day communication
  • Say no to complicated vocabulary, harsh or punitive words
  • Say no to emotions and adjectives

2) Avoid Contradiction:

Contradiction means conflict between two or more provisions. Two or more provisions are said to be in contradiction when they lead to different or opposite meaning. For example, one provision says that Time for Completion is 12 months and another provision says that Time for Completion is 9 months

A large Contract generally consists of various documents such as:

  • Contract Agreement
  • Letter of Acceptance
  • Particular Conditions of Contract
  • General Conditions of Contract
  • Technical Specifications
  • Data Sheet & drawings
  • General Technical Requirements

All the above documents are integral part of the Contract. Also, each document consists of various clauses and sub-clauses that define the rights and obligations of the parties. Accordingly, we should draft all such documents with due diligence so that there is no contradiction between various clauses of a particular document or across different documents.

The above is critical because otherwise it may invite dispute. This is because each party starts referring to those provisions which suits them the most. Both parties become adamant and stick to its stand and use all tricks to prove its points. So it becomes very difficult to resolve the matter or to ascertain who is right. The end result is a lot of wastage of time and effort due to unnecessary correspondence, discussion and meetings.

The contradiction arises, because as a normal practice, a contract document is reviewed by different stakeholders. Accordingly, cross-functional team starts making changes in certain provisions of a document or in a particular clause as relevant to them. However, they missed to make corresponding changes in other clauses or in other documents, as deemed necessary in the context. As a result, we end up forming a Contract with lot of contradictory provisions

Please refer to next post for balance 4 rules

Please read disclaimer statement by clicking: Disclaimer Statements


Difference Among Lump Sum, Item Rate and Cost Plus Contracts (Part 2)

In the last post we discussed that various contracts type based on compensation method may include Lump Sum, Item Rate and Cost Plus Contracts. Also, we further discussed about Lump Sum Contracts. Please click on the link below to read this post

Difference Among Lump Sum, Item Rate & Cost Plus Contracts

In this post, I wish to explain Item Rate and Cost Plus Contracts in more detail. In construction industry, there is enough use of item rate contracts especially for the execution of civil works by Contractor as per Owner’s design. However, Cost Plus are not so common and we see them rarely

Contracts Classification based on Compensation Method

B) Item Rate Contracts:

Item Rate means “contract price” for “unit quantity” of each “work item” as defined under scope of work. Sometime it may not be possible for the Owner to ascertain exact quantities for identified work items. This may happen because of the nature of the work, and/or design not fully completed and/or some inputs are missing to ascertain exact quality. So, the Owner stipulates the “estimated quantities” of each work items. Accordingly, the quantities, finally executed by Contractor, may be different. Therefore, in these circumstances, where quantities are likely to change, it is not prudent to invite Lump Sum Price or sign a Lump Sum Contract. Here Item Rates Contract (i.e. unit price contract) seems best fit, as it extend flexibility to address “quantity changes” within certain range (as agreed by parties), without any need to follow lengthy Variation & Variation Order Procedure.

In Item Rate Contracts, Owner defines the comprehensive Bill of Quantities, which consists of detailed description of Work Items, Unit of Measurement and estimated quantities. Accordingly, Owner invites and bidder quote the “Rate/Price” for “unit quantity” of each BOQ Item. Such contracts where different unit price exists for respective BOQ Items are called Item Rate Contracts.

Unit Rates contractually binding, not total price

The Unit Rate mentioned against each work items is the “contract price” for “unit quantity” of such item. Therefore, it is a contractually binding price. However, the item price which is obtained by multiplying the unit price with estimated quantity is a notional price. The actual item-wise price to be paid contractually shall depend upon the actual executed quantities.

Subject to other contract conditions, Owner is bound to pay for actual executed quantities based on the Unit Prices stipulated in the Contract. This is true as long as actual quantities do not vary beyond the prescribed limits. Total Price which is obtained by adding the item price of all BOQ items is again the estimated Total Price rather than Total Contractual Price. Total Contract Price (or Contract Price) as stipulated in the item rate contracts is necessary for the purpose of ascertaining BG or LD Amount. However, it does not dilute the spirit of Item Rate Contracts

C) Cost Plus Contracts:

In certain situation, in view of nature of work, it may not be possible for the Owner to clearly mention work items as well as quantities with greater certainty. So the scope of work is a stipulation of final requirements with a general description of work items and tentative quantities. Also, there is a high probability that the work items and/or the associated quantities may change.

Therefore, in the above circumstances, it would not be possible for the contractor to quote Lump Sum Price or Unit Rates because both work items and quantities are not fixed. Hence, it is prudent to select a reputed contracting organization having versatile experience and enter onto Cost plus Contract. Under such contracts Owner pay the contractor based on actual cost incurred plus reasonable profit.

Significance and relevance of cost plus contracts

Cost Plus Contracts are best fit and most suitable when there is high degree of uncertainty in the scope of work and both work items & quantities are likely to change. This mainly happened for scope of work where:

a) industry practice is not established
b) scope of work is entirely new or some thing totally different
c) work is being executed first time and
d) Owner and/or Contractor have not executed similar work in the past
e) Owners and/or Contractor are not able to estimate the cost with reasonable accuracy

Disclaimer Statements

Difference Among Lump Sum, Item Rate & Cost Plus Contracts

In the previous post, we covered the contract classification based on Nature of Transaction and Mode of Project Delivery. Accordingly, we discussed the difference among Supply, Service Contracts & Works Contracts and among EPC, EPCM and Multiple Packages Contracts

In this post, we are going to discuss various kinds of contracts under the broad category called Compensation Method / Method of Payment .

One organization may prefer to pay Lump Sum Price for the entire scope of work. However, other one may choose to pay based on rates agreed for each work item multiplied by corresponding quantities. Yet a third one may like to pay the contractor based on the actual cost incurred plus reasonable profit. Each type has its own merits and demits and no one is absolutely wrong or right.

Based on the Compensation Method, contracts are classified as follows;

A) Lump Sum Contracts
B) Item Rate Contracts
C) Cost plus Contracts

We deal with such contracts very frequently in our work life. The purpose of this post is to understand the significance of each type and eventually know their distinguishing features. This will help to choose the right fit for a given situation. 

Let us now discuss above contracts in more details

Classification based on Compensation Payment

A) Lump Sum Contract:

The word lump means to combine, aggregate, bunch or consolidate. The word Lump Sum means Aggregated Amount or Consolidated Amount.

As the name suggests, Lump Sum Contracts consists of Total Consolidated Amount against the given scope of work. In such contracts, Owner defines detailed Scope of Work and/or Materials to be Supplied and/or Services to be rendered by the Contractor and as required to execute and complete the work. And, Owner invites Total Aggregated Price from the bidders for the entire scope of work.

Consolidated Price which include all associated costs for all supplies and services is called Lump Sum Contract PriceLump Sum Price is a consideration for all liabilities and obligations of Contractor. Also, this lump sum amount is a contractual price between the parties. Consequently, Owner is bound to pay such price as long as the scope of work remains unchanged. Any further break up of Total Price in the form of Price Schedule/Priced Bill of Quantities is to facilitate payment. Existence of item price, sub-component or component price in the Price Schedule does not dilute the essence of Lump Sum Contract

Significance and relevance of Lump-sum Contracts

Lump Sum Contracts are very common industry practice for procurement of engineered products, specialized services and for execution of design-build & EPC/Turnkey Contracts. Owner prefers to obtain lump-sum price so as to ascertain the Total Cost before starting the works. Also, it is easy to compare various offers when received on the basis of Lump-sum Price. By doing so, Owner transfer the risk of quantity variations to the Contractor

Lump Sum Contracts are best fit and most suitable when there is a full clarity on the Scope of Work. This means works items and quantities are known with greater certainty and the probability of scope/quantity change is comparatively less. This mainly happened for execution of works where industry practice is established and when bidders have full understanding of scope and enough prior experience to accurately calculate and quote the Lump Sum Price and successfully perform the awarded works

Item Rate and Cost Plus contracts shall be covered in the next post

Disclaimer Statements

Difference among EPCM, Multiple Packages and EPC Contracts (2)

In the last post we discussed how contracts are classified based on the Mode of Project Delivery. We read that depending upon the mode of project delivery; various contracts / contracting approaches could include EPC, EPCM and Multiple Package Contracts. Further we discussed EPC Contract in more detail in the previous post. Please click here to read that post: http://www.rkstrainings.com/difference-among-epcm-multiple-packages-and-epc-contracts/

In this post we wish to discuss EPCM and Multiple Packages Contracts in further detail. Both posts together shall bring out more clarity on the distinguishing features of each type. A careful analysis and comparison above contracts / contracting methods shall reveal the appropriate usage of each one

Contract Classification based on Mode of Project Delivery:

Please re-read the example of Construction of Ramesh’s House in the previous post by clicking the above link

EPCM and Multiple Packages Contracts in more details:

B) Multiple Packages Contracts

In the last post we discussed that EPC Contracts are best option if Owner intend to award the entire scope of works to a single agency. This is done to minimize the interfacing issues and holding single agency responsible for completion of the entire job within agreed cost and timelines.

However, another Owner may not prefer to award the entire scope of work to a single agency. This Owner may be cost conscious or desire to have better control on the project. Further, a single agency (i.e. EPC Contractor) may not have enough experience in all disciplines of the project. Accordingly, the EPC Contractor may end up subcontracting certain parts of the scope, which are outside his portfolio, to other agencies

In view of the above, Owner may find it better to split the work into various packages keeping in view the nature of work and/or availability of contractors (e.g. Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Supply, Installation etc.). As a result, the Owner may appoint a separate agency for the execution of each package. 

In the above contracting mode, Owner supervise the work of each contractor. Further, Owner also assumes responsibility for coordination and interfacing between different contractors. Under Multiple Packages approach, each individual package is executed as a separate contract and communication between various contractors is through the Owner.

C) EPCM Contracts:

EPCM means Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management.

This contracting approach is a modification of other types to remove their disadvantages. Multiple Packages method offer advantage of overall lower cost to the Owner. This is because Owner is awarding each package directly to an entity who is most competitive for the given scope under individual package. However, coordination between various agencies and resolving interfacing issues is a major problem in this model.

EPCM is a hybrid model and could help the Owner to take the benefits of multiple packages approach together with managing the interfacing issues through appointment of an expert. Under EPCM Model, Owner appoint EPCM Contractor in addition to various package contractors and place this agency in between owner and packages contractors

EPCM Contractor work as agent of the Owner; complete the design; support the Owner in procurement of Project Plant & Equipment and manage the Construction Services. Construction Contractor work under the supervision of EPCM Contractor. EPCM Contractor responsible for interface management and advise. Owner remains responsible for all technical and commercial matters associated with the Project  

EPCM Contracts are most suitable for smooth execution of project when;

i) Owner does not have enough experience for execution of similar projects
ii) Owner is not very skilled in monitoring the contractors
iii) Owner lacks expertise in resolving interfaces between various agencies
iv) Owner intend to reduce construction cost and ready to take reasonable risk

Please click the link to read disclaimer statements http://www.rkstrainings.com/disclaimer-statements/

Difference among EPCM, Multiple Packages and EPC Contracts

In the last post we covered Contract Classification based on the Nature of Transactions. We discussed that based on the kind of transaction, contracts are classified as Supply, Services and Works Contracts. Please click here to re-read last posts: http://www.rkstrainings.com/difference-among-supply-service-and-works-contract-2/

In the business world, every business entity is dependent on other firms for procurement of goods, services or works. Organizations undertake such procurement activities through mutually agreed Contract Agreements. However, the contracting philosophy of each organization may be different. One organization may prefer to appoint a single agency for entire scope of work and the other one may choose to break the scope into number of work packages. In the second situation, organization prefers to break the scope based on the nature of work and availability of good number of contractor for that work. As a result, they wish to appoint a separate contractor for each package

So depending upon whether Owner intends to execute the work by integrating or breaking the scope, contracts are classified as followings;

A) EPC Contracts
B) Multiple Packages Contracts
C) EPCM Contracts

In this post, we shall cover EPC Contracts. Multiple Packages and EPCM Contracts shall be covered in next post

Contract Classification based on Method of Project Delivery

Let us try to understand the concept of Level of Integration with a common example. Suppose Ramesh want to construct his dream house on 500 SQM plot. He may prefer to execute the work by awarding a single integrated contract for the entire scope of work. In this situation there will be only one contractor (called EPC Contractor) who will be responsible for design, supply of all materials and provisions of all services that are necessary for the construction of house including foundation, structural works, finishing and MEP works etc.

Alternately, Ramesh may divide the works into 3-4 packages based on the nature of work e.g. Civil Works (Foundation and Structural Works), MEP Works and Finishing Works and could award each package to three separate contractors. Further, there is a third approach which is in between and a mixture of the two. Here, Ramesh may follow multiple package approach and additionally could also appoint an experienced consultant, in between, to undertake engineering services, for supporting the owner in procurement and to act as Owner’s advisor to manage the construction contractors. This consultant is called EPCM (Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management) Contractor and type of contract is called EPCM Contracts

Now let us discuss each type in further details

A) EPC Contract

EPC Contracts are the contracts entered between the parties for turnkey execution of works. The party who execute the work on turnkey basis is called EPC Contractor and party who is the owner of the work is called Owner or Employer. Under EPC Contract, owner intends to award the entire scope of the work to one contractor and such contractor is a single point responsibility for design, construction and completion of the project in all respect so that owner could operate the facility just by the turn of a key.

As the entire work is being done by a single agency, EPC contracts are fully integrated contracts. Mostly these contracts are executed through two parties approach, i.e. Owner and Contractor so as to reduce the interfacing and associated risks. Under EPC contracts, Owner does not interfere much and only concerned with on-time completion of work and within agreed Contract Price. Under this type of Contractual arrangements, Contractor takes all risks and remain fully responsible and accountable to meet the critical project parameters such as time, cost and quality. In-fact, Contractor is responsible to meet the outlined or performance specification of Owner rather than detailed specifications.

As all risks under EPC Contracts are assumed by the EPC Contactor, such contracts result into higher cost for the owner. However, such contracts de-risk the owner from the contractual claims of additional cost and time to large extent. This is because there are less interfacing issues and limited/no  opportunity for the EPC Contractor to blame the Owner for claiming additional cost or time. Therefore, in this type of contractual arrangements, Owner is certain about the cost and time for completion of the project.

Disclaimer Statements

Difference among Supply, Services & Works Contracts (1)

Hi Friends,

In the previous posts, we have covered Basic Concepts and Definition of a Contract. Now the next step in the journey is to discuss different kind of contracts and rationale behind their classification.

Contracts could be classified into various types based on the followings categories;

In this post, we will discuss various types of contracts based on: Nature of Transaction. Contracts types based on other categories shall be covered in the subsequent posts. After reading all blogs under this chapter, we will come to know the characteristics and application of each kind. Accordingly, we would be able to appreciate their distinguishing features

A) Contract Classification based on Nature of Transaction

There exists thousands of firms, companies or commercial organization across the world who are doing business locally, regionally or globally. Can we think off what exactly they are doing? You know that all business entities either sells goods or provides services or both. This is true irrespective of whether a firm is small, medium, large or local, national, multinational

At macro level, nothing exists beyond goods or services, a business entity may be doing or can think of doing. So, all commercial entities around the globe undertake transaction of selling goods and/or providing services to their customers. And they are earning profits out of such transactions.

So, depending upon whether the transaction is a Sale or Service or a combination of both, contracts are classified as Supply; Services or Works, as further explained below

1 Supply Contracts

There are the contracts for SALE and PURCHASE of GOODS between the parties. The party who sells the GOODS is known as Seller or Supplier and party who buy/purchase the goods is called buyer or purchaser.

[In the above, ‘GOODS’ means “moveable property” and as defined under the Sale of Goods Act. Sale of immoveable property such as residential house and others is outside the purview of this blog. As per Section 2.7 of Sale of Goods Act, ‘Goods’ means every kind of moveable property other than the actionable claims and money and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale]

[In the above, ‘GOODS’ means “moveable property” and as defined under the Sale of Goods Act. Sale of immoveable property such as residential house and others is outside the purview of this blog. As per Section 2.7 of Sale of Goods Act, ‘Goods’ means every kind of moveable property other than the actionable claims and money and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale]

Under supply contracts, seller transfers the property in the GOODS to buyer for money consideration and transaction between the parties is known as SALE (or Purchase) of GOODS.

Important ingredients of Supply Contracts are as follows:

  • Sale of moveable property (called ‘Goods’)
  • Transfer of ownership of ‘goods’ from Seller to buyer
  • Delivery of goods (or transfer of possession) from seller to buyer
  • Payment of money consideration from buyer to seller

The GOODS as described above may be readily available with the seller or alternately, seller need to procure or manufacture it before supply. Accordingly, Seller transfer the possession of goods to buyer if goods already existing or Seller agree to transfer the possession of goods at later mutually agreed date (if goods need to be procured or manufactured) as per the terms of Contract of Sale of Goods between the parties. So under supply contracts there is a physical movement of goods from one party to another. And this is key distinguishing features of Supply Contracts when compared with Service Contracts

Examples of Supply Contracts:

Supply Contracts are pure sale contracts without any element of service. We deal with supply contracts daily sometime consciously or sometime even not knowing that we are doing so. Few examples of supply contracts are as follows;

i) Procurement of general provision items from local retail shops; Purchase of furniture, mobiles phone, garments, TV & AC from a retail stores are typical example of supply contracts in personal life

ii) Procurement of raw materials, components, finished product or a complete package/system from our vendors by the organization buyers are typical example of supply contract in our work life.

Please click on the link below to read and accept disclaimer statements:

Disclaimer Statements

Sale of Goods Act – Law Governing Supply Contracts

In the last post we discussed Indian Contract Act, a statue applicable to the contractual relationships between the parties. Please click on the link below to read the post again

http://www.rkstrainings.com/indian-contract-act-law-governing-contracts/

In this post we are going to discuss Sale of Goods Act, a specific law related to sale/purchase of good

Sale of Goods Act

Sale of Goods Act, 1930 is the another most important and relevant Business Law for Contracts and Procurement. This law was enacted in 1930 and known as Sale of Goods Act, 1930. The statue came into force on 1st July 1930 and was drafted based on English Sale of Goods Act, 1893

The Act defines set of rules with regards to Sale of Goods. The Statue deals with transaction of sale/purchase of moveable goods between buyer and seller. The term “Goods” is clearly defined under the law and hence statue apply to the things covered in the definition. This act provides the norms with regards to: Formation, Performance and Suit for Breach with regards to the Contract of Sale of Goods between the buyer and seller. It also provides stipulations regarding the rights of buyer and un-paid seller

Sale of Goods Transaction

Chapter VII of Indian Contract Act, 1872 also lay down certain provisions in relation to Sale of Movable Goods. However, subsequently, after few decades, environment of business & trade undergone substantial changes. Hence new relationships developed between business entities. So the provision of Chapter VII of Indian Contract Act appeared to be inadequate to address issues concerning mercantile transaction

Accordingly, need was felt to enact a new law that exclusively set forth the specific provisions in relation to sale/purchase dealings of modern business relationships/methods. However, general provision of Indian Contract Act will continue to apply to newly enacted Sale of Goods Act

Sale of Goods constitutes the majority share of all the business transaction undertaken across the globe. So a thorough understanding of this act is important to fully appreciate the subject

Relationship of Sale of Goods Act with Indian Contract Act

Indian Contract Act and Sale of Goods Acts are: related, interdependent & complementary. They are not totally independent statues. This is clear from the followings provisions of Sale of Goods Act 1930

  • Chapter 1, Section 2 – Definitions, Serial No (15) of Sale of Goods Act, 1930 says that the expression used but not defined in this act and defined in Indian Contract Act, 1872 have the meaning assigned to them in that act
  • Section 3 of Sale of Goods Act, 1930 titled Application of Provision of Act 9 of 1872 stated that all such provisions of Indian Contract Act, 1872, if not inconsistent with express provisions of Sale of Goods Act, shall continue to apply to the Contract for Sale of Goods
  • Sale of Goods Act uses terms such as Contract of Sale of Goods or Agreement to Sell, Offer, Acceptance, void & voidable contracts. The true meaning of such terms has been defined in Indian Contract Act, 1872
  • Sale of Goods Act refers to the Indian Contract Act at number of places. So, this act is a specialized branch of Indian Contact Act rather than a distinct act

Indian Contract and Sale of Goods Act not mutually exclusive

From the above, we can say that two acts are not mutually exclusive. Actually they do consist of common term and overlapping provisions. Hence both Acts must be read together to draw a full understanding on the subject. Sale of Goods Act, 1930 is subsequently step to provide specific provisions in relations to Sale of Goods while keeping the fundamental & general provision of Indian Contract Act, 1872 intact and applicable thereto

=======================================================================

Disclaimer Statements: http://www.rkstrainings.com/disclaimer-statements/

Significance of MOU and its most suitable use

Dear Readers,

In the last post we discussed what MOU is and how it is different from a contract. Please click on the link below to read it again

http://www.rkstrainings.com/2022/01/31/difference-between-mou-and-contract/

In this post, I wish to explain the significance of MOU and its most appropriate usage. Accordingly, we will realize its relevance for commercial and non-commercial agreements entered between stakeholders. Here, we shall cover the followings topics;

A) What is most suitable use of MOU
B) What is significance of MOU
C) MOU a first step towards contract formation

A) What is most suitable usage of MOU

Both, MOU and Contracts, set out the promises made by parties to meet certain objectives. Also, by signing such documents, parties make commitment to keep such promises. The only differentiator is whether the parties intends to be legally bound or not. In the event, parties are willing to create legal relationship, the document is called a Contract, otherwise, it is a just a MOU even if we name it otherwise. 

In view of the above, MOU is perfect document to form related parties’ agreements. Whereas, contract is a right document for non-related parties’ transactions. Accordingly, MOU seems a perfect fit for the following types of agreements and relationships

  1. Inter-departmental agreements of big corporates
  2. Agreements between regional offices of large organizations or between different entities of a diversified Business Group
  3. Agreements between state governments or state-central governments
  4. Cooperation agreements between different countries through their governments or government entities as part of diplomatic relationships
  5. Agreements between different ministries or between a ministry & associated PSU (e.g. between Ministry of Power and Power Generation Entity)
  6. Community development agreements to meet common objectives for mutual benefits where there is no intention of profit
  7. Collaboration agreements to undertake social, moral or public cause as a volunteer

In the above cited example, parties do not want to drag each other to court for breach of promises, rather they wish to exit freely without any legal complication. Article dated 02-03-2018 published in The Time of India – “State signs MOU with Tata Trusts for Comprehensive cancer care network” is good example to realize right usage and significance of MOU. https://www.tatatrusts.org/article/inside/government-of-telangana-tata-trusts-sign-mou-to-provide-state-wide-cancer-care

B) What is significance of MOU

Importance of MOU is evident from the following points;

  • Though MOU does not bind the parties legally, but, it clearly outlines the understanding between them by putting in record the broad terms agreed. So, by signing MOU, parties bind each other with respect to agreed terms so that they discharge their respective duties smoothly
  • MOU being a formal document imparts full clarity about the requirements & responsibilities of the parties. It lay down the action to be taken by each one to achieve the common goal. Hence, it binds the parties morally and professionally. Also it makes the parties accountable to each other with respect to agreed terms
  • In view of the above and because of signed MOU in place, a party simply cannot back out from its commitments without losing its face value, respect and reputation. This demonstrate the significance of MOU

C) MOU first step towards contract formation

MOU is generally a first steps towards contract formation. It also paves the way to enter into a legally binding contract at later stage. Please see below few situations where commercial entities prefer to initiate the relationship through MOU before signing a formal contract;

  1. Emerging business scenarios where rules of the game are not settled
  2. New experiments/first time experiences where parties want to test the strength of their relationship through MOU before entering into a formal contract. This is a good  step to limit the risk exposure
  3. Business relationships where parties wish to enter into relationship initially through MOU to see how it work before signing a legally binding contract 
  4. Situations where parties first sign MOU to record broad level understanding. This could be followed by detailed contract at later stage. Signed MOU will them become a base for drafting contract. And this MOU become a reference document and facilitates the review, negotiations and finalization of the contract

=======================================================================

Disclaimer Statements: http://www.rkstrainings.com/disclaimer-statements/

Difference between MOU and Contract

Dear Readers,

MOU is a common term and we hear about it frequently in our work life. Business Entities and Central/State Governments regularly draft/sign MOU’s to records the mutual promises and understanding of the parties. Also, they keep on referring/interpreting existing MOU to know the respective duties of parties. So what is the relevance of this document and how it is different from a Contract ? In this post, we will discuss the meaning & significance of MOU and its relationship with Contact

In this post we are going to discuss briefly the followings topics;

  1. What is a Memorandum of Understanding
  2. Difference between Memorandum of Understanding and Contract

1) What is a Memorandum of Understanding

The word memorandum means: a written message or a written note or a written report prepared for future use by parties or intended recipients. The term understanding means: agreement or mutual consent or in depth knowledge of a subject matter. Understanding is said to be reached when both parties agree something in the same sense (meeting of mind) and have full clarity of their own and each other’s promises

From the above, we can define Memorandum of Understanding as a written document describing an understanding and/or agreement between two or more parties. Parties signing the MOU assures each other to act as per agreed terms but do not intend to be legally bound for such terms. So, MOU expresses the promises made by the parties to achieve a common goal but such promises are not enforceable by the Law. Hence, MOU seems to be a more formal alternative to gentlemen’s agreement, but, lacks the binding power of a contract

If you wish to read what is a Contract and/or Agreement, please click on below link

http://www.rkstrainings.com/what-is-a-contract/

http://www.rkstrainings.com/agreement-meaning-and-definition/

2) Difference between MOU and Contract

 

Above points demonstrate how MOU is different from a Contract

=======================================================================

Disclaimer Statements: http://www.rkstrainings.com/disclaimer-statements/

=======================================================================

Difference b/w Contract Administration and Management

Dear Readers,

In the last post we discussed Contract Life Cycle and its 4 stages. Please click on below link to read this post again

http://www.rkstrainings.com/contract-life-cycle-and-its-various-stages/

In this post, we are going to discuss the meaning and definition of other key terms related to Contracts i.e. Contract Formation, Administration and Management. Contract life cycle explains the activities under Contract Formation and Administration.  This post will clearly bring out the difference between Contract Administration and Management

The above discussion will eventually give a clear overview of Contract Management Process

Difference between Contract Administration and Management

A) Contract Formation

This process starts after receipt of user requirements and ends when Contract is signed with selected vendor. Contract formation process commence upon sending RFQ/Enquiries to identified bidders/agencies. It continues until offers received, technical and commercial evaluation completed, price agreed and LOA issued. The process ends when both parties sign the formal agreement

Let us understand Contract Formation Process in context to painting example

We know that objectives in term of ScopeTimeBudget, and Quality are set under stage 1 of Contract Life Cycle. So, the next step is to identify and appoint a painter who is a best fit for meeting such objectives. We achieve this by undertaking following steps

  1. Identify 2-3 potential painting agencies
  2. Send RFP/Enquiries (with requirements: Scope, Time, Quality) and invite offers from agencies identified
  3. Receiving offers and evaluating against set requirements
  4. Shortlist agency who meets most of requirements & offer better price
  5. Discuss, negotiate and agree upon the final price and payment terms
  6. Put all agreed terms on a piece of paper and sign the agreement

Contract Formation is a pre-award process because it covers all activities until Contract Award. Because it starts with PR and ends with PO (Contract Award), we also call it Purchase Requisition (PR) to Purchase Order (PO) Process

Contract Administration

Contract Administration is a process that involves all activities undertaken by Owner to ensure receipt of goods/services or completion of works as per the contract thereby meeting the intended contract objectives. This process commences upon Contract Award. It continues until goods/services received or work completed, payment made, claim settled and all contractual obligations met by both parties. This Process ends when the contract is formally closed

In context to painting example, here painter carryout the painting work as per Contract and Raj makes due payment to painter. Once both parties have completed their respective obligations to the satisfaction of each other, they formally close the Contract and come out of the binding relationship

Contract Administration is a post-award process because it covers all activities after contract award. It is also called PO to Closeout Process because it starts with PO (Contract Award) & ends with Contract Closeout

The process focuses on getting goods/services/works of requisite quality, on time and within Contract Price

Contract Management

Contract Management is a process of entering into a Contract with vendor/contractor for meeting certain objectives and undertaking Contract Administration for achieving such objectives through performance by each party as per Contract. This is broader term which includes Contract Formation, Administration and Closure

From the above, we can say that:

1) Contract Management = Contract Formation + Contract Administration
2) Contract Management = PR to PO Process + PO to Closeout Process

The above explanation brings out the difference between Contract Administration and Management. In other words, Contract Management is a larger process and Contract Administration is one part of it

=======================================================================

Disclaimer Statements: http://www.rkstrainings.com/disclaimer-statements/

Agreement not declared void behavioural traits Capacity of the parties Consideration necessary for a valid contract Contract Administration Contract Formation Contract Management Contract Objectives Contract Principles corporate leaders Difference between MOU and Contract Equity Free Consent Indian Contract Act Intention to create legal relationships Item Rate Contracts Justice Lawful Consideration Law Governing Contracts Law governing supply contracts Lump Sum Contracts MOst suitable use of MOU Offer and Acceptance Reasonableness Sale of Goods Act Secure person Significance of MOU Voidable Contracts Void Agreements What is a Contract What is agreement What is consideration What is MOU whether all agreements are contracts